Skip to content

Bing Ads

Bing Ads: The Search Network Your Competitors Forgot

Same buying intent as Google, thinner auctions, and an audience that skews older, wealthier, and more B2B.

How we operate

  • No % of ad spend. Ever.

  • No contracts. Cancel anytime.

  • Guaranteed geo & market exclusivity.

What this is

A smaller network is not a worse buyer

Microsoft Advertising, still universally called Bing Ads, carries a fraction of Google search volume. That fact is used to dismiss it, and it hides the part that matters commercially: the person searching has exactly the same intent, and far fewer advertisers are bidding for them.

Less competition for identical intent is arbitrage. For the right categories the same lead costs noticeably less here, and the gap persists because most competitors never bothered to set the network up.

The honest limit is volume. Cheaper clicks on a smaller pool will not replace Google, and we will not pretend otherwise. This is a supplement that improves your blended cost per customer, not a headline channel.

Bing vs Google

Where Each Network Earns Its Place

Complements, not alternatives. The order you buy them in matters more than choosing between them.

Swipe to compare

Where Each Network Earns Its Place
TopicGoogleBing / Microsoft
VolumeThe overwhelming majority of commercial searchA fraction, but real money in the right categories
Cost per clickHighest, because every competitor is biddingUsually meaningfully lower for the same intent
Audience skewEveryoneOlder, higher income, more desktop, more workplace
Unique targetingThe deepest audience and automation toolingLinkedIn profile targeting on company, industry, and job function
Buy itFirst. Prove the economics hereSecond, once Google works and you want cheaper volume

What we run

Cheaper Clicks, and Who They Are Cheaper For

The audience skew is the whole story on this network. It decides whether the arbitrage is real for you.

Why the clicks are cheaper

Nothing about the buyer is worse. There are simply fewer advertisers competing for them.

Thinner auctions

Many competitors never set Microsoft up at all. Fewer bidders on the same commercial searches usually means a lower price for the same intent.

Default placement

Microsoft powers search across Windows, Edge, and Outlook, plus partner networks. A lot of that traffic is people using whatever was already there.

Work devices

A meaningful share of searches happen on company machines during business hours, which is why B2B advertisers often see this network outperform.

Who it works best for

The audience skew is real, and it decides whether this channel is worth your time.

B2B and professional services

Buyers researching from work. Microsoft also offers targeting informed by LinkedIn profile data, which no other search network can match.

Higher-ticket home services

The audience skews older and toward higher household income, which suits roofing, HVAC replacement, pool building, and similar considered purchases.

Healthcare and legal

Categories where the buyer skews older and the value of a single case or patient easily justifies testing a second network.

How we run it

Cheap traffic managed carelessly is still wasted money. The discipline does not change.

Import, then diverge

Campaigns import from Google to start, then get separated. Left as a mirror, they inherit assumptions that do not hold on a different audience.

Separate reporting

Judged on its own cost per customer, not blended into a paid search total where a smaller channel is invisible either way.

Honest sizing

We tell you what volume to expect before you start. A cheaper click on a fraction of the searches is still a fraction of the searches.

When Bing Is Worth It, and When It Is Not

This is the easiest channel on the site to oversell, because "cheaper clicks" sounds like a free win. Sometimes it is. Often it is a small line item that costs more attention than it returns. The difference is predictable enough to set out plainly.

It works when the buyer skews older or corporate

The audience is genuinely different: more desktop, more Windows defaults, more searching from a work machine during business hours. That maps well onto B2B services, professional and legal work, healthcare, and higher-ticket home improvement where the decision-maker is likely to be older and better off.

In those categories we regularly see cost per enquiry come in below Google for the same terms. Not because the traffic is better, but because fewer people are bidding on it.

It works when a single customer is worth a lot

Lower volume is a smaller problem when one conversion pays for months of budget. A law firm or a roofing company can justify a second network on a handful of cases a year. A business selling a low-value repeat service usually cannot.

It does not work as a first channel

You need volume to learn quickly, and Google has it. Proving your economics on the smaller network takes longer and produces a noisier answer. Start where the data arrives fastest, then add this once you know what a customer is worth.

It does not work as a copy of your Google account

Importing campaigns is the sensible way to start and a poor way to continue. Device splits differ, the audience differs, and search term patterns differ, so a mirrored account slowly accumulates spend on terms that behave differently here.

Left untouched, an imported account is usually the version of this channel that people conclude "does not work".

It does not work for impulse or youth categories

If your buyers are young, mobile-first, or making quick emotional decisions, the audience skew works against you and the volume is thin. For those businesses the budget belongs on Meta or YouTube, and we will say so.

How we decide

We estimate available search volume in your market and category first, set it against your average customer value, and give you a straight answer on whether it is worth managing. Roughly half the time the answer is not yet.

Why us

What Makes This Different

  • We will tell you to skip it

    For plenty of local consumer businesses, the volume here does not justify the setup. We would rather say so than add a line item.

  • Flat fee

    No percentage of spend, which matters on a smaller channel where a percentage fee makes the economics worse than the media.

  • Not a copy of your Google account

    Importing is the starting point, not the strategy. Different audience, different devices, different negatives, different bids.

  • Tracked properly

    Same call and conversion tracking as everything else we run, so this channel can be judged rather than assumed.

  • Your account

    In your name, with the history, exactly like your Google account. We take access rather than ownership.

  • One client per market

    The auctions are thin here. Running two competitors in the same market would raise the price for both of you.

Questions

Bing Ads Questions

For B2B, professional services, healthcare, and higher-ticket home services, usually yes. The clicks are typically cheaper and the competition thinner. For low-value local consumer services the volume often does not justify the setup.

Find Out If the Arbitrage Is Real in Your Market

Book a strategy call. We will size the available volume in your category and tell you honestly whether a second network is worth running.

High intent? Skip the form.(407) 279-1929